Agropod team discussing program design with farmers in a field

REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE PROGRAM DESIGN

Design the program before you fund the rollout.

Agropod helps food, fuel, and consumer-goods companies test how farmers and agricultural advisers may respond to incentives, risk, recognition, technical support, flexibility, and data requirements—before investing in a large-scale regenerative agriculture program.

Behavioral research for better program design.

Before launch, answer four questions

01 Will suppliers participate?

02 What keeps them involved?

03 What makes the program workable?

04 What evidence can it produce?

Most regenerative agriculture programs are designed from the buyer’s perspective.

Companies usually know the environmental outcome they want. What they may not know is whether the offer is attractive enough to join, practical enough to implement, valuable enough to continue, and workable enough to produce reliable information over time.

Participation

Will the offer be worthwhile for different types of participants?

Durability

Will participation continue after the first season or first reporting cycle?

Program fit

Do the requirements fit real operational decisions and constraints?

Credible information

Can farmers and advisers provide the information the company needs over time?

Agropod helps companies test these questions before committing capital to scale.

Agropod helps companies test these questions before committing capital to scale.

Test the decisions before you scale the program.

01 Define the program

Specify the practices, incentives, recognition, risk, technical support, flexibility, data requirements, and intended outcomes.

02 Test the decisions

Participants make repeated choices in digital serious games and choice experiments as economic, environmental, social, and governance conditions change.

03 Improve the design

Agropod identifies participation barriers, tradeoffs, trust risks, durability questions, and issues that should be validated in a farmer-focused pilot.

See where a program is strong—and where it may fail.

01 / PARTICIPATION

What attracts participation

Economic value, risk protection, recognition, technical confidence, flexibility, and perceived program value.

02 / CONTINUATION

What supports continuation

Trust, useful feedback, fair rules, competent support, autonomy, and continued relevance.

03 / RESISTANCE

What creates resistance

Uncertainty, administrative burden, unclear data use, rigid requirements, weak perceived value, and lack of support.

04 / VALIDATION

What needs validation

Commercial payment levels, farmer enrollment, long-term retention, operational reporting, and real-world outcomes.

BUYER TAKEAWAY

A program can create strong initial interest and still be difficult to sustain. Agropod helps companies distinguish recruitment from durable participation.

Two ways Agropod helps companies prepare agricultural programs.

Program and evidence readiness

Agropod helps companies test whether a proposed agricultural program is capable of generating sustained participation, usable supplier information, and the relationships needed for later Scope 3, FLAG, product-footprint, 45Z, or carbon-project workflows. This is not compliance certification. It is behavioral and operational readiness work that supports better program design before field implementation.

Trust and participation diagnostics

Agropod helps companies understand why farmers, advisers, cooperatives, or other partners may hesitate to work with them. We test how different program partners, incentives, technical-support models, data rules, accountability mechanisms, and community benefits may affect trust and willingness to participate. The work helps identify sources of resistance and test designs that may improve trust and legitimacy.

Built from repeated-choice research—not just stated preferences.

Agropod’s research uses digital serious games and repeated-choice experiments to examine how people make decisions when economic value, environmental outcomes, risk, recognition, technical performance, trust, and data governance interact. Rather than asking only what participants say they prefer, the research observes how decisions change across repeated scenarios and changing conditions.

RESEARCH MODULE 01

Conservation and recognition

A serious game examined how nonfinancial recognition influenced simulated conservation decisions, cover-crop allocation, financial tradeoffs, risk orientation, and continued pursuit over repeated decisions.

Buyer question: How might recognition shape continued engagement alongside financial and environmental tradeoffs?

RESEARCH MODULE 01

Conservation and recognition

A serious game examined how nonfinancial recognition influenced simulated conservation decisions, cover-crop allocation, financial tradeoffs, risk orientation, and continued pursuit over repeated decisions.

Buyer question: How might recognition shape continued engagement alongside financial and environmental tradeoffs?

RESEARCH MODULE 02

Agricultural data governance

A serious game examined how Certified Crop Advisers evaluated repeated choices between a large agribusiness platform and a local farmers network under changing economic value, recommendation accuracy, community outcomes, and data-risk conditions.

Buyer question: Which data-governance conditions may support durable participation and trust?

RESEARCH MODULE 02

Agricultural data governance

A serious game examined how Certified Crop Advisers evaluated repeated choices between a large agribusiness platform and a local farmers network under changing economic value, recommendation accuracy, community outcomes, and data-risk conditions.

Buyer question: Which data-governance conditions may support durable participation and trust?

CONSERVATION GAME: WEATHER, COST & RECOGNITION

DATA GOVERNANCE GAME: YIELD, PROFIT & SHARING

A clearer basis for deciding what to test next.

DECISION PACKAGE

RESEARCH-INFORMED

Program design findings

What the research supports about the proposed program and where design choices need attention.

Program design findings

What the research supports about the proposed program and where design choices need attention.

Participation and durability questions

The questions that need further testing before a broader rollout.

Participation and durability questions

The questions that need further testing before a broader rollout.

Trust and data-governance risks

Where relationships, data rules, and perceived legitimacy may create resistance.

Trust and data-governance risks

Where relationships, data rules, and perceived legitimacy may create resistance.

Pilot recommendations and research gaps

What should be validated with the intended farmer population before scale.

Pilot recommendations and research gaps

What should be validated with the intended farmer population before scale.

Before you commit capital, test the program design.

Talk with Agropod about a focused pilot for a regenerative sourcing, low-carbon feedstock, agricultural data, or sustainability program.

Discuss a Pilot

Programs farmers want to join.

Decision support for regenerative agriculture programs.

Agropod uses serious games and behavioral research to inform program design. Research findings should not be interpreted as direct predictions of commercial farmer behavior or as certification, verification, carbon-accounting, or tax-credit determinations.

© 2026 Agropod LLC. All rights reserved.

Programs farmers want to join.

Decision support for regenerative agriculture programs.

Agropod uses serious games and behavioral research to inform program design. Research findings should not be interpreted as direct predictions of commercial farmer behavior or as certification, verification, carbon-accounting, or tax-credit determinations.

© 2026 Agropod LLC. All rights reserved.

Programs farmers want to join.

Decision support for regenerative agriculture programs.

Agropod uses serious games and behavioral research to inform program design. Research findings should not be interpreted as direct predictions of commercial farmer behavior or as certification, verification, carbon-accounting, or tax-credit determinations.

© 2026 Agropod LLC. All rights reserved.